Print sustainability claims you can stand behind
Generic claims invite scrutiny. Specific claims backed by product-level data don't.
Generic claims invite scrutiny. Specific claims backed by product-level data don't.
.webp)







Regulators and retailers expect claims to be specific, substantiated, and traceable to a recognised methodology. Generic claims like "lower carbon" without product-level data are the ones that attract scrutiny. Altruistiq calculates cradle-to-grave PCFs aligned to GHG Protocol and ISO 14067, and generates methodology documentation automatically as you calculate. The substantiation exists before legal needs to review it.
Altruistiq automatically generates methodology reports documenting your data sources, assumptions, and calculation approach, aligned to GHG Protocol and ISO 14067. Every number traces back to source data and emissions factors in a single click. Legal gets a complete audit package, without a spreadsheet to interpret.
PCFs recalculate when formulations change. Claims update to reflect current product performance without rebuilding substantiation from scratch. Version control tracks what changed between updates, so you can show exactly why a claim changed if challenged.
No. Build methodology for one product and apply the same approach systematically across your portfolio. Start with priority SKUs where claims will have the most commercial impact, and expand from there.
The audit documentation is already built. Every calculation includes a full trail from source data through emissions factors to final result, with an audit log recording every platform action. You can respond to regulatory inquiries with evidence of a rigorous, documented process, not a retrospective reconstruction.
Altruistiq's methodology aligns to GHG Protocol, ISO 14067, and PEF-friendly standards. This covers multi-market compliance, so you can assess regulatory risk across geographies with different green claims enforcement before entering new markets.
Altruistiq's methodology aligns to GHG Protocol, ISO 14067, and PEF-friendly standards. This covers multi-market compliance, so you can assess regulatory risk across geographies with different green claims enforcement before entering new markets.
Yes. Every PCF is versioned, so when a product changes (whether that's packaging, ingredients, or sourcing) you have a documented before-and-after comparison calculated on consistent methodology.
That consistency is what makes the claim defensible. You're not comparing two different approaches, you're comparing the same calculation applied to two different versions. Whether specific claim wording meets regulatory requirements in your market is a legal question, but the data foundation to support it is already there.
SOC-2 certified. ISO27001 compliant. Your data never leaves your secure instance with Evie AI.
With Evie, your data stays in your secure instance, it’s never sent externally for AI processing. You have complete control.
SOC-2 certified. ISO27001 compliant. Your data never leaves your secure instance with Evie AI.
With Evie, your data stays in your secure instance, it’s never sent externally for AI processing. You have complete control.