Getting More Specific Emissions Factors

Getting More Specific Emissions Factors

Today, most companies rely on just a few dozen emissions factors, often applying one-size-fits-all emissions factors (e.g., a single factor for "pork") across entire product portfolios. This is understandable. Companies may only have access to a narrow range of emission factors, and it is just simpler to use one emission factor when faced with a wide portfolio. However, generic emissions factors can’t account for differences in sourcing, production, and cooking methods. Unfortunately, this means the only way you could possible reduce your emissions for ‘pork’…would be to buy less ‘pork’.

So, how can you obtain more specific EFs?

The first step is to understand where you actually need more specific emissions factors (EFs). Start by focusing on the parts of your inventory where emissions are highly concentrated. For your Purchased Goods and Services, what share of emissions are concentrated in a single EF? Anything above 5% should ring alarm bells, especially if this represents numerous product types. This approach will give you a list of material product areas where having a 100 specific EFs versus one generic EF is most critical.

Then what?

You now have a list of product or commodity areas to target, then it begins with asking the right questions. Most sustainability professionals work with third-party partners, such as software providers or consultants, to help field the answers.

Here are some key questions to ask when seeking more precise emissions data:

• How much variation and granularity exists in the emissions factors?
• Are the EFs region-specific? For instance, if I'm sourcing tomatoes from 15 different countries, are there distinct EFs for each?
• What drives emissions differences for this particular commodity? For instance, what characteristics make ‘pork’ lower in emissions?
• What emissions factor databases and LCA sources are available?
• Is there a modelling methodology that captures granular emissions for this commodity. For different fat contents of milk for example?

The more you investigate and question, the better you'll understand the calculations, allowing you to shape the accuracy of your emissions data.

‍

‍

Written by Saif Hameed

‍

Supply Chain Traceability: Building Trust with Farmers for a Sustainable Future

This is a write up of the Supply Chain Traceability panel at our recent Flagship F&B Summit. Panelists included: Eleonore de Montjoye (Pizza Hut), Camilla Riddiford (Arla), Matthew Ryan (Nestle), Bethany Jones (Altruistiq).

Traceability in supply chains is more than just a regulatory buzzword—it’s about building real partnerships with farmers. Success hinges on four key factors: trust, simplicity, incentives, and timing. Here’s a dive into the nuances that make or break supply chain traceability:

• Trust as a Foundational Currency: Farmers need to see clear benefits to share data. As partners, not just producers, they want assurance that their data is used transparently. They must see value in opening their operations to scrutiny, knowing that their data won’t be used against them. Trust is a two-way street and must be earned.
• Keep It Simple: Farmers already face enough challenges—complex data requests shouldn’t be one of them. Streamlined processes like one-time data entries (via PACT!) make engaging farmers more easily.
• Meaningful Incentives: Financial incentives are an obvious motivator, but data can be just as valuable. Offering feedback and insights based on the data farmers provide is a game-changer. Imagine receiving actionable advice on soil health or water management based on the data you shared—now, that’s a relationship that benefits both sides. If farmers can see how their data translates into tangible improvements at the farm level, they’re much more likely to form a partnership.
• Timing is Key: Ever tried to get a farmer to fill out paperwork during harvest season? Good luck. Timing matters just as much as trust and incentives when it comes to traceability. Companies need to align their data requests with the farming calendar, understanding when it’s realistic to ask for information and when it’s not.

In the end, true traceability is about more than just checking boxes—it’s about creating meaningful, lasting partnerships with farmers who are integral to the process. By prioritising trust, simplifying data-sharing, offering real incentives, and respecting the farming calendar, companies can build supply chains that are both transparent and resilient. It’s a path that ensures not just compliance, but a shared commitment to a more sustainable future.

‍

Eleonore de Montjoye

‍

Written by Frankie Musson

Other News

• 🪸🚢 Historic Ocean Liner to Become the World’s Largest Artificial Reef (Politico): The SS United States, a 1,000-foot ocean liner and transatlantic speed record-holder, is set to be transformed into the world’s largest artificial reef off Florida's coast. The ship will be sunk to create a new dive attraction, anticipated to boost local tourism. The process is expected to take over 1.5 years and cost more than $10 million.
• 🇨🇴🌲🐛 Colombia’s Focus on Inclusivity as Biodiversity Summit Host (Guardian): Colombia's Cali welcomes world leaders and activists for Cop16, a pivotal UN biodiversity summit. The event aims to tackle the global decline in wildlife and ecosystems. Colombia's government emphasizes inclusion, engaging Indigenous, Afro-descendant, and local communities in discussions. While the initiative is praised, some Indigenous leaders argue their involvement remains superficial. Cop16 follows up on the 2022 Kunming-Montreal agreement, aiming to turn global conservation promises into actionable plans amid warnings of biodiversity loss reaching critical levels.
• 🇺🇸🔋Biden Races to Secure Clean Energy Investments Before Election (Euronews): With climate sceptic Trump on Harris’ tail and the U.S. presidential election approaching, President Joe Biden is prioritizing clean energy by approving billions for green projects and advancing major offshore wind initiatives. This includes substantial investments under the Inflation Reduction Act and other laws like the infrastructure bill.
• 💻☢️ Tech Companies Embrace Nuclear Power for AI Needs (Independent): Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are turning to nuclear energy to support their AI growth. Microsoft signed a 20-year energy deal for power from Three Mile Island, Google partnered with Kairos Power for small modular reactors, and Amazon is developing SMRs with Energy Northwest. As AI projects demand increasing energy, nuclear power offers a carbon-free solution, helping these tech giants meet their ambitious climate goals.